RT. sophisticated, seems believable. But is it propaganda or alternative news? (II)

RT's choices of news coverage often leaves the impression it's offering information that Western TV networks deliberately downplay or avoid. 'Fracking' is a good example. Hydraulic fracturing is a system of oil extraction that is harmful to the environment and but boosts the efficiency and therefore the profits of international oil conglomerates. Specifically it is accompanied with risks of ground and surface water contamination, air and noise pollution, the triggering of earthquakes, and hazards to public health.

RT is known to cover protests against 'fracking' anywhere, in spite of the fact that protests against 'fracking' have not been considered as widespread uprisings by the Western press. But RT has devoted much time and attention to them as if they reflect a rebellious society everywhere. This is seen as a deliberate strategy, favouring the interests of Russia's oil and gas monopoly, Gazprom, by discouraging profitable competition and attempting to maintain high oil and gas pricing. Observers state that in a general sense, the underlying message goes much further: RT may be conceeding that the Russian regime is no angel (within proscribed, tight editorial limits) and living in Russia's has its hardships, but the West should not point its finger at Moscow, being just as bad if not worse and that the US is the worst of all.