Telli Menüü

What happens after Ukraine defeats the Russian invaders? (Part Two)

The Ministers of Defense for Lithuania (Arvydas Anušauskas) and Ukraine (Oleksiy Reznikov) both pointed out the folly of a long drawn out war. First, allowing Russia to strike from a distance with impunity is immoral and second, increasing support by small increments prolongs the war without imposing sufficient costs on the attacker.

(Part one can be found here.)

Congressional representatives Shaheen, a Democrat, and Hutchinson, a Republican, both supported providing F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine. Providing air -cover for the better tanks now possessed by the Ukrainians would increase the potency of Ukrainian counter offensives. Poland and Slovakia have already recognized the need to provide Ukraine with greater airpower. Providing Ukraine with weapons to win the war would force Russia to negotiate.

Victory for Ukraine must include driving Russians out of Crimea to ensure security of the Ukrainian coastline. Letting Russia hang on to Crimea rewards territorial conquest. The real excuse offered by some for letting Putin keep Crimea is to leave the regime of Russia intact. While the nations of Eastern Europe recognize the continuing threat of Russia, too many countries want to return to business as usual. The defense ministers dealt with the excuses, beginning with safeguarding the nuclear weapons. The locations of nuclear weapons, consisting of many components, are known, the facilities are heavily guarded and most importantly the personnel are rational.

Täismahus artikkel on loetav Eesti Elu tellijatele

Igal nädalal toome me sinuni kõige olulisemad kogukonna uudised ja eksklusiivsed lood uutelt kolumnistidelt. Räägime eestlastele südamelähedastest teemadest, kogukonna tegijatest ja sündmustest. Loodame sinu toele, et meie kogukonna leht jätkuks pikkadeks aastateks.

Hind alates $2.30 nädalas.

Vaata tellimispakette

Loe edasi